Deep Tech · IP Strategy · Infrastructure

We don't build hardware.
We patent the physics.

VECTOR IP is a deep-tech intellectual-property incubator. We find the physical principle behind a critical gap, file the patents that protect it, and license them to the manufacturers who build on top.

Where we stand. Braking: European patent application filed with the EPO on 17 August 2026; the twelve-month priority window for international extension is running. Drones: specification in preparation. Freedom-to-Operate and simulation are the next milestones. Nothing on this page is a granted patent — these are pending applications.

Scroll
What we do

We identify a critical gap — and patent the principle
that closes it.

Asset-light by design: no factories, no production risk. We don't bet on who wins the market — we own the toll gate the winners pay to cross. Risk is diversified across independent megatrends.

01

Identify the gap

Find a critical, defensible gap in a large and growing market.

02

Secure the IP

Protect the underlying physical principle with patents before the market reacts.

03

Validate

Prove the concept and de-risk it toward real-world deployment.

04

License globally

License to global manufacturers — OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers.

OEM / TIER-1 MAKERS VECTOR IP IP patented principle % license fee per unit MARKET
One patented principle — every manufacturer pays at the gate. We don’t compete with the winners; they license from us.
The model

Why IP-first.

The highest value isn't created at the hardware level — it's created at the level of global standards. That is where we operate.

A hardware startup

  • High CAPEX — factories, tooling, inventory
  • Physical production and logistics
  • Production risk grows with every unit
  • Margins squeezed from both sides

VECTOR IP

  • Low CAPEX — no factories, no inventory
  • One patent family, many licensees
  • Licensing scales without production risk
  • Value sits in the patents, not in factories
01

The patent has to hold

Claims broad enough that the principle cannot simply be designed around — and a Freedom-to-Operate study confirming we may use it ourselves.

02

Someone has to sign

A licence from an OEM or a Tier-1 supplier, after independent validation on their terms. That decision is theirs to make, and it is slow.

03

We have to last until then

Patents, simulation and prototypes are paid for years before the first royalty arrives. The capital in between is the risk we actually manage.

A licensing model carries a high gross margin by construction — no factories, no inventory. That is the definition of the model, not evidence that it works. These three conditions decide it.

Focus 01 · Automotive safety

Brakes are not the limit.
Grip is.

Modern brakes can stop a wheel's rotation almost instantly. The hard part is stopping the car — and that is decided by the grip between tyre and road. Beyond the grip limit, stronger brakes change nothing.

The physics

Friction sets the distance.

Stopping distance is governed by the friction between tyre and road — tyre type and temperature, road surface, and above all water. When grip runs out, braking distance grows and control disappears.

Our approach

Actively increase downforce.

During braking, our principle presses the vehicle to the road exactly when it matters most. More downforce means more friction, more braking force — and a way through the water film that causes aquaplaning.

The impact

Shorter distance, softer impact.

Engineering estimates, now entering validation: braking distance shorter by ~10–15 % on dry roads and 20–30 % in adverse conditions.

And what can't fully stop, hits slower — every km/h shed before impact lowers crash energy, protecting property, health and lives.

Brakes applied · 80 km/h conventional car still doing 40 km/h here Conventional 61.7 m With active downforce 46.3 m ✓ 15.4 m saved 01020 304050 6070 distance (metres)
Illustrative engineering model — same car, same speed (80 km/h), adverse conditions: 25 % shorter, the middle of the 20–30 % range above. The arithmetic is checkable: at a 25 % shorter distance the conventional car is still doing exactly half its initial speed — 40 km/h — at the point where ours has stopped. Engineering estimate pending validation; the real gain depends on tyre condition and pressure, road surface and standing water.
~92Mnew vehicles produced worldwide every year
10–30 %estimated braking-distance reduction (dry → adverse)
OEM / Tier-1licensing path into series production
Seatbelts ABS Airbags ESC AEB Active downforce

Safety technologies follow a familiar trajectory: innovation → differentiation → standard equipment. We design for that path.

~92M new vehicles every year Asia — ~58M (62 %) Europe — ~19M (21 %) Americas — ~15M (16 %) Africa — ~1M (1 %)
≈92 million new vehicles are produced every year — the market a new safety standard addresses.
Focus 02 · Autonomous logistics

Drone logistics scales only as fast
as its batteries swap.

Delivery drones fly roughly 20–30 minutes per charge. The bottleneck isn't flying — it's what happens on the ground, at scale, in real weather.

The problem

Robotics is fragile and expensive.

Today's robotic battery-swap stations rely on precision sensors and actuators that are costly to build and struggle in wind, rain and snow. Every failed swap means manual intervention — and an idle fleet.

Our approach

Physics instead of robotics.

A passive, mechanical stabilization principle captures the drone and enables battery exchange reliably — even in poor weather. Robust by design: no fragile robotics to buy, maintain or heat.

The impact

The cost is the station, not the seconds.

Thirty seconds saved per swap is real, but modest: 1,000 drones flying 20 missions a day gain about ~166 hours a day — roughly 2 % of the ~8,300 hours that same fleet spends in the air.

The value sits elsewhere. Because the capture is mechanical, the station needs no precision sensors or actuators: cheaper to build, unbothered by wind, rain and snow, and it does not send a technician out every time a swap fails.

Capture & swap passive, mechanical, repeatable Swap in seconds not minutes of charging Operates in wind & rain physics, not fragile robotics
Schematic illustration only — passive mechanical capture and swap, no precision robotics.
20–30 mintypical flight time per battery charge
All-weathermechanical reliability where robotics fails
No roboticsnothing precise to break, heat or calibrate
Roadmap · 2026–2027

De-risking in the right order.

Early deep tech is about verifying the biggest risks first — cheaply, and in sequence. We know what we are validating, in what order, and why.

01

Patents & FTO

File and expand key patent families; secure Freedom to Operate.

02

Simulation

Digital-twin verification of the physics and boundary conditions.

03

Prototypes (PoC)

Functional mechanics — weight, response time, repeatability.

04

Independent testing

Real-world trials across surfaces and conditions; expert reviews (TÜV).

05

Proof of concept

Proof of Technical & Licence Concept — first OEM / Tier-1 partnerships.

Team

Proven by the market.

The same system, repeated: a big problem → strong IP protection → validation → global potential → a strong team.

Inventor

Name to be announced in Q4 2026

A prolific inventor with dozens of granted patents across global jurisdictions and a rare gift for mechanical engineering. Both pillars grow from the same instinct: mastering forces — vectors — with elegant mechanics.

IP strategy

Ing. Jan Vondraš, Ph.D., MBA

Builds patents to hold up from the perspective of global corporations; his clients have included LG, Boeing and Fujitsu-Siemens. Former senior technology executive — and an inventor in his own right.

Co-founder

Ing. Petr Just

Business development, AI, nuclear physics. Author of Homo APIens. First investor and co-builder of ventures that reached the market — StimVia and BattSwap.

StimVia — breakthrough non-invasive neuromodulation; on the market and expanding internationally.
BattSwap — battery swapping for electric last-mile logistics; on the market with real revenues.

Who owns what: every patent application is filed in the name of VECTOR IP s.r.o., and the inventors assign their rights to the company by written contract before filing. The company is Czech (VECTOR IP s.r.o., ID No. 245 58 893, Prague), its ownership is a matter of public record, and the filings can be checked in the patent registers.

Vision

The foundations of autonomy shouldn't be built twice.

One principle — many licensees Asset-light — no factories Global OEM / Tier-1 licensing
Contact

Let's talk.

Licensing, partnerships, media — or a technical conversation about the physics.